Accepted https://marta.velnic.net/ en ACQUISITION OF DITRANSITIVE STRUCTURES IN CROATIAN CHILD LANGUAGE https://marta.velnic.net/publications/acquisition-ditransitive-structures-croatian-child-language <span class="title">ACQUISITION OF DITRANSITIVE STRUCTURES IN CROATIAN CHILD LANGUAGE</span> <span class="uid"><span>m.vel</span></span> <span class="created">Fri, 28/07/2017 - 09:13</span> <dt> Authors </dt> <dd class="field-authors"> <div> Velnić, Marta </dd> <dt> Year </dt> <dd class="field-year"> <time datetime="2016-09-28T12:00:00Z">2016</time> </dd> <dt> Publication Status </dt> <dd class="field-publication-status"> Accepted </dd> <dt> Journal </dt> <dd class="field-journal"> FDSL 2015 Proceedings </dd> <dt> Attachment </dt> <dd class="field-attachment"> <div> <span class="file file--mime-application-pdf file--application-pdf"><a href="https://marta.velnic.net/sites/default/files/2017-07/attachments/m.velnic%20FDSL%202015%20proceedings%20draft.pdf" type="application/pdf">m.velnic FDSL 2015 proceedings draft.pdf</a></span> </dd> <div class="field-abstract field"> <div> <p>Ditransitive structures involve a certain degree of complexity because they require a verb and three arguments: agent, recipient, and theme. In free word order languages, such as Croatian all combinations of (S)ubject, (V)erb, and (O)bjects order are attested (Siewierska, 1998). This can pose some challenges for the language-acquiring child since the word orders are governed by pragmatic factors such as <em>animacy</em>, <em>givenness, pronominality, weight, focus, </em>and others. In this paper, I will be focusing on how Croatian children acquire ditransitive structures and their word order permutations and how <em>animacy</em> and <em>accessibility </em>affect word order in these structures.</p> <p>The corpus data shows that children start by using the most frequent structure in the adult language: “Daj-(give-IMP) mi(me-CL) +DO-ACC". The corpus searches have established that it is not acquired as chunk since both 'daj' and 'me' are productive.</p> <p>However, the naturalistic data analysed here was not suitable for investigating animacy and givenness because it did not provide the necessary contrasts: all IOs were animate and most of the DOs were is some way accessible. We nevertheless found, in the limited portion of NP-NP combinations of the child data, some instances of new&gt;given order, which suggests that children sometimes fail to take the interlocutors perspective into account. </p> </div> </div> Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:13:09 +0000 m.vel 18 at https://marta.velnic.net